Renewal intent
44%
Accounts touched quarterly
Letterly vs ActiveCampaign
Layer a human touch on top of your automations whenever the relationship is worth fighting for.
Revenue and CX teams that still rely on automations but need a concierge tier for VIPs.
Understanding the limitations of ActiveCampaign helps teams see why human-first communication delivers better results when relationships matter most.
Advanced automations can still feel like marketing blasts.
Designing unique landing pages for each segment strains ops.
Teams need a compliant way to showcase emotion plus analytics.
Template guardrails enforce typed-by-hand authenticity.
Microsites embed Looms, playlists, or voice memos instantly.
Team dashboards show which sentences resonated most.
See exactly how Letterly's human-first approach compares to ActiveCampaign's automation-focused features. Each comparison highlights why handwritten microsites outperform bulk email tools for retention and relationships.
Dedicated microsites + QR codes.
Email, SMS and basic landing pages.
Paste-blocked editor and localized prompts.
Email composer optimized for templates.
Editors leave context + encouragement inline.
Shared automations require admin changes.
Feels like a bespoke note.
Feels like marketing, even when targeted.
Real data from teams using Letterly to replace or augment ActiveCampaign. Share these stats in competitive deals, investor updates, and internal enablement.
Renewal intent
44%
Accounts touched quarterly
Concierge adoption
52%
Teams layering with ActiveCampaign
Average word count
186
Per handwritten page
Share this page in your email signature, sales enablement docs and investor updates. It links directly to local hubs, industry stories and the pitch narrative.